Can AI Rely on the Systematicity of Truth? The Challenge of Modelling Normative Domains | Philosophy & Technology


  • Abela, P. (2006). The Demands of Systematicity: Rational Judgment and the Structure of Nature. In G. Bird (Ed.), A Companion to Kant (pp. 408–422). Blackwell.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Amodei, D. (2024). “What if Dario Amodei Is Right About A.I.?.” Interview by Ezra Klein. The Ezra Klein Show, New York Times Opinion, April 12, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-dario-amodei.html

  • Askell, A., Bai, Y, Chen, A., Drain, D, Ganguli, D, Henighan, T., Jones, A., Joseph, N., Mann, B, & DasSarma, Nova. (2021). “A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861.

  • Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., Kernion, J., Jones, A., … & Kaplan, J. (2022). Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073.

  • Beisbart, C. (forthcoming-a). “Epistemology of Artificial Intelligence.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta.

  • Beisbart, C. (forthcoming-b). “In Which Ways Is Machine Learning Opaque?.” In Philosophy of Science for Machine Learning: Core Issues and New Perspectives. Edited by Juan Durán and Giorgia Pozzi. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Berlin, I. (2002). Two Concepts of Liberty. In H. Hardy (Ed.), Liberty (pp. 166–217). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berlin, I. (2013). The Pursuit of the Ideal. In H. Hardy (Ed.), The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas (pp. 1–20). Princeton University Press.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berlin, I., & Williams, B. (1994). Pluralism and Liberalism: A Reply. Political Studies, 42(2), 306–309.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blum, C. (2023). Value Pluralism versus Value Monism. Acta Analytica, 38(4), 627–652.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brooks, T., & Stein, S. (Eds.). (2017). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Buckner, C. (2023). From deep learning to rational machines: What the history of philosophy can teach us about the future of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.

  • Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (Ed.). (1997a). Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (1997b). Introduction. In R. Chang (Ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason (pp. 1–34). Harvard University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2002). Making Comparisons Count. Routledge.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2009). Voluntarist Reasons and the Sources of Normativity. In D. Sobel & S. Wall (Eds.), Reasons for Action (pp. 243–271). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2013). Commitments, Reasons, and the Will. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics (Vol. 8, pp. 74–113). Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2015a). Value Incomparability and Incommensurability. In I. Hirose & J. Olson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory (pp. 205–224). Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2015). Value Pluralism. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 25, 21–26.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2016). Comparativism: The Grounds of Rational Choice. In E. Lord & B. Maguire (Eds.), Weighing Reasons (pp. 213–240). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2017). Hard Choices. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3(1), 1–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chang, R. (2023). Three Dogmas of Normativity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 40(2), 173–204.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chappell, T. (2009). Ethics and Experience: Life Beyond Moral Theory. Durham: Acumen.

  • Chappell, S. G. (Ed.). (2015a). Intuition, Theory, and Anti-Theory in Ethics. Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chappell, S. G. (2022). Epiphanies: An Ethics of Experience. Oxford University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chappell, T. (2015b). Knowing What To Do: Imagination, Virtue, and Platonism in Ethics. Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Constantinescu, M., Vică, C., Uszkai, R., & Voinea, C. (2021). Blame It on the AI? On the Moral Responsibility of Artificial Moral Advisors. Philosophy and Technology, 35(2), 1–26.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Cueni, D. (2024). Constructing Liberty and Equality – Political, Not Juridical. Jurisprudence, 15(3), 341–360.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cummins, R., Blackmon, J., Byrd, D., Poirier, P., Roth, M., & Schwarz, G. (2001). Systematicity and the Cognition of Structured Domains. Journal of Philosophy, 98(4), 167–185.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dancy, J. (1995). In Defense of Thick Concepts. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 20(1), 263–279.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without Principles. Clarendon Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dillion, D., Mondal, D., Tandon, N., & Gray, K. (2025). AI language model rivals expert ethicist in perceived moral expertise. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 4084. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86510-0

  • Downes, S. M., Forber, P., & Grzankowski, Alex. (2024). “LLMs are Not Just Next Token Predictors.” arXiv arXiv:2408.04666.

  • Dupré, J. (1995). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Elazar, Y., Kassner, N., Ravfogel, S., Ravichander, A., Hovy, E., Schütze, H., & Goldberg, Y. (2021). Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9, 1012–1031.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feng, N., Marsso, L., Yaman, S. G., Standen, I., Baatartogtokh, Y., Ayad, R., … & Chechik, M. (2024, June). Normative requirements operationalization with large language models. In 2024 IEEE 32nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (pp. 129-141). IEEE.

  • Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against Method (3rd ed.). Verso.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Franks, P. W. (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Harvard University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galison, P., & Stump, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaukroger, S. (2020). Civilization and the Culture of Science: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1795–1935, Civilization and the Culture of Science. Oxford University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giubilini, A., & Savulescu, J. (2018). The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy and Technology, 31(2), 169–188.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldstein, S., & Levinstein, B. A. (2024). Does ChatGPT Have a Mind?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11015.

  • Goodman, B. (2021). “Hard Choices and Hard Limits for Artificial Intelligence.” Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.

  • Greene, J. (2013). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. Penguin Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Greene, J. D. (2016). Our Driverless Dilemma. Science, 352(6293), 1514–1515.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guyer, P. (2003). Kant on the Systematicity of Nature: Two Puzzles. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 20(3), 277–295.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Guyer, P. (2005). Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hämäläinen, N. (2009). Is Moral Theory Harmful in Practice?—Relocating Anti-theory in Contemporary Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(5), 539–553.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heathwood, C. (2015). Monism and Pluralism about Value. In I. Hirose & J. Olson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory (pp. 136–157). Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Herrmann, D. A., & Levinstein, B. A. (2025). Standards for Belief Representations in LLMs. Minds and Machines, 35(1), 1–25.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hooker, B., & Little, M. O. (Eds.). (2000). Moral Particularism. Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jang, M., Lukasiewicz, T. (2023). “Consistency Analysis of ChatGPT.” Singapore, December.

  • Kambartel, F. (1969). ““System” und “Begründung” als wissenschaftliche und philosophische Ordnungsbegriffe bei und vor Kant.” In Philosophie und Rechtswissenschaft: Zum Problem ihrer Beziehung im 19. Jahrhundert. Edited by Jürgen Blühdorn and Joachim Ritter, 99–122. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

  • Kekes, J. (1993). The Morality of Pluralism. Princeton University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kitcher, P. (1986). Projecting the Order of Nature. In R. Butts (Ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Material Nature (pp. 201–235). D. Reidel.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kretzmann, Norman, & Eleonore Stump. (1989). The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts: Volume 1, Logic and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kumar, Ashutosh, & Aditya Joshi. (2022). “Striking a Balance: Alleviating Inconsistency in Pre-trained Models for Symmetric Classification Tasks.” Dublin, Ireland, May.

  • Landes, E., Voinea, C., & Uszkai, R. (2024). Rage against the authority machines: how to design artificial moral advisors for moral enhancement. AI and SOCIETY, 1-12.

  • Larmore, C. (1987). Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, H., Phatale, S., Mansoor, H., Lu, K. R., Mesnard, T., Ferret, J., … & Rastogi, A. (2023). Rlaif: Scaling reinforcement learning from human feedback with ai feedback.

  • Leuenberger, M. (2024). Should You Let AI Tell You Who You Are and What You Should Do? In D. Edmonds (Ed.), AI Morality (pp. 160–169). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levinstein, B. A., & Herrmann, D. A. (2024). “Still No Lie Detector for Language Models: Probing Empirical and Conceptual Roadblocks.” Philosophical Studies, 1–27.

  • Liu, Y., Guo, Z., Liang, T., Shareghi, E., Vulić, I., & Collier, N. (2024). “Measuring, evaluating and improving logical consistency in large language models.” arXiv arXiv:2410.02205.

  • Losano, M. G. (1968). Sistema e struttura nel diritto, vol. 1: Dalle origini alla scuola storica. Turin: Giuffrè.

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mason, E. (2023). “Value Pluralism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Summer 2023 ed.

  • Messer, A. (1907). Besprechung von Otto Ritschl: System und systematische Methode in der Geschichte des wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauchs und der philosophischen Methodologie. Göttinger Gelehrte Anzeigen, 169(8), 659–666.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Millgram, E., & Thagard, P. (1996). Deliberative Coherence. Synthese, 108(1), 63–88.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nagel, T. (2001). Pluralism and Coherence. In M. Lilla, R. Dworkin, & R. Silvers (Eds.), The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin (pp. 105–111). New York Review of Books.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Neurath, O. (1935). Einheit der Wissenschaft als Aufgabe. Erkenntnis, 5, 16–22.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ouyang, L., Jeffrey, Wu., Jiang, Xu., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., & Ray, A. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 27730–27744.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Queloz, M. (2021). Choosing values? williams contra Nietzsche. The Philosophical Quarterly, 71(2), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa026

  • Queloz, M. (2024a). The Dworkin-Williams debate: Liberty, conceptual integrity, and tragic conflict in politics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 109(1), 3–29.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Queloz, M. (2024b). Moralism as a dualism in ethics and politics. Political Philosophy, 1(2), 433–462. https://doi.org/10.16995/pp.17532

  • Queloz, M. (2025). The ethics of conceptualization: Tailoring thought and language to need. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198926283.001.0001

  • Rescher, N. (1981). “Leibniz and the Concept of a System.” In Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Nature: A Group of Essays, 29–41. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Rescher, N. (1979). Cognitive Systematization: A Systems Theoretic Approach to a Coherentist Theory of Knowledge. Blackwell.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rescher, N. (2000). Kant and the Reach of Reason: Studies in Kant’s Theory of Rational Systematization. Cambridge University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rescher, N. (2005). Cognitive Harmony: The Role of Systemic Harmony in the Constitution of Knowledge. University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ritschl, O. (1906). System und systematische Methode in der Geschichte des wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauchs und der philosophischen Methodologie. Bonn: C. Georgi.

  • Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sandis, C. (2006). Dancy Cartwright: Particularism in the philosophy of science. Acta Analytica, 21(2), 30–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sen, A. (1981). Plural Utility. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81(1), 193–216.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sorensen, T., Jiang, L., Hwang, J. D., Levine, S., Pyatkin, V., West, P., … & Choi, Y. (2024, March). Value kaleidoscope: Engaging ai with pluralistic human values, rights, and duties. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, No. 18, pp. 19937-19947).

  • Stein, A von der. (1968). “Der Systembegriff in seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung.” In System und Klassifikation in Wissenschaft und Dokumentation. Edited by Alwin Diemer, 1–13. Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain.

  • Stocker, M. (1990). Plural and Conflicting Values. Clarendon Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tasioulas, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Humanistic Ethics. Daedalus, 151(2), 232–243.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thompson, K. (2017). Systematicity and Normative Justification: The Method of Hegel’s Philosophical Science of Right. In T. Brooks & S. Stein (Eds.), Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System (pp. 44–66). Oxford University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Troje, H. E. (1969). “Wissenschaftlichkeit und System in der Jurisprudenz des 16. Jahrhunderts.” In Philosophie und Rechtswissenschaft: Zum Problem ihrer Beziehung im 19. Jahrhundert. Edited by Jürgen Blühdorn and Joachim Ritter, 63–88. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

  • Vickers, P. (2013). Understanding Inconsistent Science. Oxford University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vieillard-Baron, J.-L. (1975). “Le concept de système de Leibniz à Condillac.” In Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 17.-22. Juli 1972. Edited by Kurt Müller, Heinrich Schepers and Wilhelm Totok, 97–103. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.

  • Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., … & Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07682.

  • Wiggins, D., & Williams, B. (1978). “Aurel Thomas Kolnai.” In Ethics, Value and Reality: Aurel Kolnai, xxiii–xxxix. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

  • Williams, B. (1973). “Ethical Consistency.” In Problems of the Self, 166–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williams, B. (1981a). “Conflicts of Values.” In Moral Luck, 71–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williams, B. (1981b). “Moral Luck.” In Moral Luck, 20–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Routledge (Classics). Routledge.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, B. (1995a). “Formal and Substantial Individualism.” In Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993, 123–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williams, B. (1995b). “The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics.” In Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993, 153–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williams, B. (1995c). “What Does Intuitionism Imply?.” In Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993, 182–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Williams, B. (2013). “Introduction.” In Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays. Edited by Henry Hardy. 2nd ed, xxix–xxxix. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Williams, B. (2001). Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton University Press.

  • Williams, B. (2005a). From Freedom to Liberty: The Construction of a Political Value. In G. Hawthorne (Ed.), In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument (pp. 75–96). Princeton University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, B. (2005b). Pluralism, Community and Left Wittgensteinianism. In G. Hawthorne (Ed.), In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument (pp. 29–39). Princeton University Press.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ypi, L. (2021). The Architectonic of Reason: Purposiveness and Systematic Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, Y., Yan, L., Sun, W., Xing, G., Wang, S., Meng, C., … & Yin, D. (2024). Improving the robustness of large language models via consistency alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14221.

  • Zhou, J., Ghaddar, A., Zhang, G., Ma, L., Hu, Y., Pal, S., … & Hao, J. (2024). Enhancing logical reasoning in large language models through graph-based synthetic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12437.



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *